While SpaceX and Nvidia plan to place a space-optimized Vera Rubin AI system in orbit by late 2027, Google’s far more modest plan, Project Suncatcher, is to launch a test satellite with Tensor Processing Units to see whether AI data centers in space are viable. 

For SpaceX and Nvidia, it’s a race to get ahead in AI data centers in space, with Starmind AI 1 satellites. Never mind that the engineering challenges of cooling, radiation resistance, and repairability still haven’t been sufficiently addressed. While SpaceX and Nvidia are gung-ho to put full AI data centers in space as fast as possible, Google will launch the prototype satellite for Project Suncatcher to see whether Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) will fly at all. 

SpaceX leader Elon Musk is already proclaiming that “the amount of compute in space will obviously round up to 100% of all compute.” Google is more realistic. Google describes Project Suncatcher as a “long-term, research moonshot exploring whether space could one day host scalable machine learning infrastructure.”

“The amount of compute in space will obviously round up to 100% of all compute.”

This October flight marks the first orbital test for Project Suncatcher. The refrigerator-sized prototype carries four TPUs, which can run only in 15-minute bursts before shutting down to cool. Google’s research effort explores whether a constellation of solar-powered satellites, connected by high-speed optical links, could someday support large-scale machine-learning workloads.

Google wants to know if space is a good place to run AI because satellites get plenty of solar power. This first mission will expose the hardware to launch stresses, radiation, and extreme thermal conditions that can’t be reproduced fully on Earth.

As Brandon Lucia, a Carnegie Mellon University professor of electrical and computer engineering, told The New York Times, “You get a lot of weird particles out in space — high-energy radiation that we are just not exposed to on Earth. Sometimes, you get a random high-energy particle strike that is like someone throwing a dart at the insides of your computer chip.”

“Sometimes, you get a random high-energy particle strike that is like someone throwing a dart at the insides of your computer chip.”

Not to mention, Lucia added, the “cooling problem is actually quite difficult. These computers will be basking in the sun all day.”

So Google naturally wants to know if their TPUs can work in these conditions before betting the farm on AI in space. Thus, the first Suncatcher satellite will carry Google TPUs, the company’s in-house accelerators for AI workloads.

During launch, Google said the spacecraft will endure intense vibration and sustained acceleration of up to 10 times Earth gravity (g). At the same time, individual components such as the chips can experience loads of 50 to 100 g. This isn’t like moving your server rack down the road with a truck! 

The longer-term Suncatcher idea isn’t simply to run AI workloads aboard a single satellite, as SpaceX’s first mission will. Instead, Google envisions a compact AI satellite constellation. 

Each satellite will carry TPUs and communicate with partners via laser links. Google needs these links to operate at tens of terabits per second. It has demonstrated 800 Gbps in each direction — 1.6 Tbps total — with a bench-scale optical-transceiver pair.

But turning that into an orbital compute fabric requires satellites to fly unusually close together, potentially separated by hundreds of meters. Google plans a two-satellite mission in 2027 to test high-bandwidth laser communications for that next phase.

“This first launch is about seeing what works, identifying points of failure, and applying those findings to future missions.”

For now, Google just wants to know if the technology works at all.As Travis Beals, senior director of Google’s Paradigms of Intelligence research team, explained: “This first launch is about seeing what works, identifying points of failure and applying those findings to future missions.”

The post Elon Musk says space will soon hold nearly all compute. Google is still finding out if its chips can work there. appeared first on The New Stack.

SpaceX and Nvidia say they are adapting the Vera Rubin NVL72 rack-scale AI platform for orbital use, with SpaceX targeting a first launch in the fourth quarter of 2027. 

The dream of an AI data center in space lives on in SpaceX and Nvidia’s August 24 announcements that the platform for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Starmind AI satellites will be based on the Vera Rubin NVL72 chip family and architecture.

This proposed system would form the computing core of SpaceXAI’s first-generation Starmind AI satellite and extend Nvidia’s architecture from terrestrial AI data centers into space. 

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk posted on X the same day, “SpaceX, in partnership with Nvidia, has designed a space-optimized Vera Rubin NVL72 system for launch to orbit in Q4 next year, with significant scale in 2028.”

SpaceX, in partnership with Nvidia, has designed a space-optimized Vera Rubin NVL72 system for launch to orbit in Q4 next year, with significant scale in 2028 https://t.co/qdDq8YBkzl

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 24, 2026

Musk’s post came after he said during SpaceX’s Q2 earnings call, “Going forward, we’ve decided to build exclusively on Nvidia because we think the Vera Rubin architecture is the best architecture.” Musk continued, “This is not some sort of far-future, distant thing; we expect to start launching these next year. We think the design of the NVL72 VR computer is a much better design than, say, having a standard rack -style design. So we expect to deploy this on the ground as well as in orbit, because we think it’s going to be a radical simplification of the standard NVL72 rack. It will cost less. It will be more effective. If we’re going to put it in space, why not want to put it on the ground? I think that’s going to be pretty cool.”

On Earth, the Vera Rubin NVL72 is Nvidia’s rack-scale AI design that combines 72 Rubin GPUs and 36 Vera CPUs, alongside high-speed networking components such as ConnectX-9 SuperNICs. Nvidia says SpaceXAI’s planned Starmind satellite will be based on an optimized version of that system.

A conventional NVL72 rack assumes gravity, technicians, stable grid power, a building-scale liquid loop and frequent replacement of failed parts. Orbit removes each of these assumptions.

The idea is more ambitious than putting a conventional edge-AI accelerator aboard a spacecraft. Nvidia and SpaceXAI are proposing to bring a modified architecture used in AI data centers into orbit, while altering it for orbital operational requirements.

Getting that working in orbit, though, is easier said than done. 

As Curtis Pyke, founder of Kingy AI, writes, “A conventional NVL72 rack assumes gravity, technicians, stable grid power, a building-scale liquid loop and frequent replacement of failed parts. Orbit removes each of these assumptions.“

“Cooling is unforgiving. Space is cold, but vacuum does not carry heat away through convection.”

In particular, Pyke continues, “Cooling is unforgiving. Space is cold, but vacuum does not carry heat away through convection. Heat must travel from the chips to the radiator surfaces and then leave as infrared radiation. SpaceX says AI1 can avoid chillers, cooling towers and fans and reduce cooling overhead by an order of magnitude.”

SpaceX explains that AI1 would instead use closed-loop liquid cooling inside the spacecraft and large deployable radiators to send heat directly to space as infrared radiation. While the claimed reduction is physically plausible in principle, there’s no proof yet that these AI satellites’ cooling systems can deliver. 

Another major problem that remains unaddressed is how to make the orbital rack radiation-tolerant. Making Vera Rubin NVL72 radiation-tolerant means far more than putting an ordinary NVL72 rack in a shielded satellite enclosure. It would require a system-level redesign of its GPUs, CPUs, memory, networking, power, cooling, firmware, and operations around a specified orbit and mission life.

LEO orbit is not benign. NASA cites typical trapped-particle dose rates of 100 to 1,000 rad(Si) per year for low-inclination LEO spacecraft below 500 km. That level of radiation is not an immediate death sentence for electronics, but over a multiyear mission it will cause cumulative degradation. Radiation-qualified space hardware can deal with that. Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) electronics are another matter. A true radiation-hardened Rubin GPU would also require design changes at the transistor and circuit levels. 

Even were Nvidia to make such a chip, for a high-density AI system such as the SpaceX design, the concern isn’t simply whether one processor survives a 5- or 10-year dose. The satellite contains numerous radiation-sensitive elements, such as GPU logic, SRAM caches, register files, system memory, and memory controllers. With thousands of cores and billions of memory storage cells, the aggregate fault rate — not the behavior of an individual component — drives the design.

The most realistic near-term answer would be a radiation-tolerant, fault-managed Rubin-derived orbital system, not a fully radiation-hardened NVL72 in the traditional military-space sense. It could use selected commercial Nvidia parts, substantial shielding, ECC and data integrity mechanisms, redundant controllers and power paths, aggressive fault detection, software recovery, and reduced-performance operating modes.

The post SpaceX designed an orbital Vera Rubin. Radiation comes next. appeared first on The New Stack.